From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norton v. Cromwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

June, 1936.

Present — Martin, P.J., McAvoy, Townley, Untermyer and Cohn, JJ.


Order granting motion of defendant-respondent for the issuance of a commission to take testimony of certain parties in London, England, unanimously reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied. There is no authority, statutory or otherwise, for the examination of a party or witness on a preliminary motion separate and apart from a trial. ( Matter of Erlanger, 231 App. Div. 70, 72.)


Summaries of

Norton v. Cromwell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Norton v. Cromwell

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT F. NORTON, Appellant, v. JAMES H.R. CROMWELL and Another…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 707 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

Standard Foods Prods. Corp. v. Vinas Unidas SA

A contrary conclusion has been reached, however, in the first department. Such department specifically holds…

Matter of Potenza

( Matter of Erlanger, supra, p. 73.) This is unquestionably the rule in the First Department. (See Norton v.…