From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norton v. Brownsville

U.S.
Mar 5, 1889
129 U.S. 505 (1889)

Opinion

ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE.

No. 1455.

Submitted January 4, 1889. Decided March 5, 1889.

The writ of error being brought December 28th, 1886, to review a judgment rendered November 29, 1886, the citation being returnable October Term, 1887, and the record being filed in this court December 20, 1888; Held, that the court was without jurisdiction.

Mr. Sparrel Hill, Mr. Henry Craft and Mr. L.P. Cooper for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. W.W. Rutledge and Mr. William M. Smith for defendants in error.


THE case is stated in the opinion.


Judgment was rendered against the plaintiffs in error in the Circuit Court of the United States for the Western District of Tennessee on the 29th of November, 1886, and writ of error brought December 28th, 1886, accompanied by a citation to the adverse party, duly returnable to the October Term, 1887, and served in January and March of the latter year. But the record was not filed herein until December 20th, 1888, and the rule is settled that under such circumstances we do not entertain jurisdiction. Grigsby v. Purcell, 99 U.S. 505; Credit Company v. Arkansas Central Railway Co., 128 U.S. 258; Hill v. Chicago Evanston Railroad Co., ante, 170; Edmonson v. Bloomshire, 7 Wall. 306.

The writ of error is

Dismissed.


Summaries of

Norton v. Brownsville

U.S.
Mar 5, 1889
129 U.S. 505 (1889)
Case details for

Norton v. Brownsville

Case Details

Full title:NORTON v . COMMISSIONERS OF THE TAXING DISTRICT OF BROWNSVILLE

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 5, 1889

Citations

129 U.S. 505 (1889)

Citing Cases

State ex Rel. Clark County v. Hackmann

erson v. Ripley County, 181 Mo. 65; Railway v. Thornton, 152 Mo. 574; State ex rel. Egger v. Payne, 151 Mo.…

SANTA FE COUNTY v. COLER

2 Spelling, Ex. Rem., §§ 1432-1434, 1437. The court in mandamus proceedings can inquire into the original…