From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northwestern Pacific R.R. v. Interstate Comm. Comm'n

U.S.
Nov 23, 1964
379 U.S. 132 (1964)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA.

No. 381.

Decided November 23, 1964.

228 F. Supp. 690, affirmed.

Randolph Karr for appellant.

Solicitor General Cox, Assistant Attorney General Orrick, Robert B. Hummel, Arthur J. Murphy, Jr., and Robert W. Ginnane for the Interstate Commerce Commission et al.; J. Thomason Phelps for Public Utilities Commission of California et al.; Boris H. Lakusta for the City of San Rafael et al.; and Frederick G. Pfrommer for Atchison, Topeka Santa Fe Railway Co., appellees.


The motions to affirm are granted and the judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Northwestern Pacific R.R. v. Interstate Comm. Comm'n

U.S.
Nov 23, 1964
379 U.S. 132 (1964)
Case details for

Northwestern Pacific R.R. v. Interstate Comm. Comm'n

Case Details

Full title:NORTHWESTERN PACIFIC RAILROAD CO. v . INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION ET AL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Nov 23, 1964

Citations

379 U.S. 132 (1964)

Citing Cases

Tampa Phosphate R. v. Seaboard Coast Line R

Under these circumstances no further burial ritual would seem required. Today it is clear, contrary to the…

State of Nebraska v. United States

(Emphasis added.) See also Northwestern Pacific R.R. Co. v. United States, 228 F. Supp. 690 (N.D.Cal. 1964),…