From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Northern Trust Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 23, 1984
748 F.2d 803 (2d Cir. 1984)

Opinion

No. 343, Docket 84-7505.

Argued November 21, 1984.

Decided November 23, 1984.

Laura Effel, New York City (Marianne Popiel, New York City, of counsel), for defendant-appellee.

Michael C. Spencer, Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City (Ralph L. McAfee, Richard F. Simmons, John Gleeson, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

Before KAUFMAN and TIMBERS, Circuit Judges and MISHLER, Senior District Judge.

The Honorable Jacob Mishler, Senior District Judge, Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation.


The Northern Trust Company, as drawee and purported drawer of a forged negotiable instrument, sought in the district court to recover monies paid to The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., as drawee of the instrument. Judge Wyatt held that Northern Trust could not recover on the theory of money had and received, and had no cause of action for negligence or conversion. Moreover, he held that the final payment rule, see N.Y. Uniform Commercial Code § 3-418 (McKinney 1964), barred recovery by Northern Trust on theories of breach of warranty of presentment, breach of warranty on transfer and negligence. 582 F.Supp. 1380 (S.D.N.Y. 1984). We find appellant's claim of error to be without foundation, and affirm the judgment essentially for the reasons stated in Judge Wyatt's thorough opinion below.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Northern Trust Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Nov 23, 1984
748 F.2d 803 (2d Cir. 1984)
Case details for

Northern Trust Co. v. Chase Manhattan Bank

Case Details

Full title:THE NORTHERN TRUST COMPANY, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. THE CHASE MANHATTAN…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit

Date published: Nov 23, 1984

Citations

748 F.2d 803 (2d Cir. 1984)

Citing Cases

Morgan Guar. Trust Co. v. Am. Sav. and Loan

Section 3-418, comment 1; Marine Midland, 410 N.Y.S.2d at 27. The provision has been applied in forgery…

Massive Paper Mills v. Two-Ten Corp.

To prevail on its claim for conversion of money, Massive must prove (1) that it had an ownership interest or…