From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jul 15, 1970
86 Nev. 619 (Nev. 1970)

Opinion

No. 6107

July 15, 1970

Appeal from order of the Second Judicial District Court, Washoe County, refusing to set aside judgment; John F. Sexton, Judge.

Robert A. Groves, of Reno, for Appellant.

Swanson and Swanson and Wayne N. Capurro, of Reno, for Respondent.


OPINION


This is an appeal from a district court order refusing to set aside a judgment against the appellant and two other persons in an action upon a promissory note signed by all of them. The three defendants were served with process and were represented by the same attorney who prepared and filed an answer on their behalf. Trial was held and judgment entered for the plaintiff. This appellant was not present at the trial. He claims that he was not notified by his counsel of the trial date. Moreover, he asserts that he possessed a complete defense to the action against him, not enjoyed by his codefendants, which his counsel did not assert.

The district court found that after issue was joined the appellant had several conferences with his counsel and that he had full opportunity, before trial, to advise counsel of his personal defense; that counsel had attempted to notify appellant of the trial date. Consequently, that court ruled that relief under NRCP 60(b) was not warranted.

Since the record may be read to support the findings of the district court, we affirm.


Summaries of

Norris v. Phillips

Supreme Court of Nevada
Jul 15, 1970
86 Nev. 619 (Nev. 1970)
Case details for

Norris v. Phillips

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM E. NORRIS, APPELLANT, v. CHARLES F. PHILLIPS, RESPONDENT

Court:Supreme Court of Nevada

Date published: Jul 15, 1970

Citations

86 Nev. 619 (Nev. 1970)
472 P.2d 347

Citing Cases

Tahoe Village Realty v. DeSmet

See Intermountain Lumber v. Glens Falls, supra. Cf. Norris v. Phillips, 86 Nev. 619, 472 P.2d 347 (1970).…

Smith v. Smith

When a party seeks to set aside a judgment pursuant to Rule 60(b), the decision of the district court will be…