From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Norris v. Davis

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 3, 2006
Case No. 05-60126 (E.D. Mich. May. 3, 2006)

Summary

finding that a substantive claim regarding the state supreme court's denial of a delayed appeal failed to state a federal constitutional claim cognizable on habeas review

Summary of this case from Raleigh v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.

Opinion

Case No. 05-60126.

May 3, 2006


ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE KOMIVES REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


The Court having reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation in this case, as well as any objections thereto filed by the parties, and being fully advised, now therefore;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.


Summaries of

Norris v. Davis

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
May 3, 2006
Case No. 05-60126 (E.D. Mich. May. 3, 2006)

finding that a substantive claim regarding the state supreme court's denial of a delayed appeal failed to state a federal constitutional claim cognizable on habeas review

Summary of this case from Raleigh v. Warden, London Corr. Inst.
Case details for

Norris v. Davis

Case Details

Full title:BRIDGETT L. NORRIS #455892, Petitioner, v. SUSAN DAVIS, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: May 3, 2006

Citations

Case No. 05-60126 (E.D. Mich. May. 3, 2006)

Citing Cases

Wycuff v. Haviland

Regardless, Petitioner's assertion that admission of prior bad acts evidence denied him a fair trial lacks…

Williams v. Warden

(unpublished); Manning v. Rose, 507 F.2d 889, 893-95 (6th Cir. 1974).Norris v. Davis, No. 05-60126, 2006 WL…