From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Noorollah Bakhshandeh v. the Continental Insurance Company

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 1, 1954
129 F. Supp. 122 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

Opinion

November 1, 1954.

Enrico S. Sanfilippo, New York City, for plaintiff.

Bigham, Englar, Jones Houston, New York City, for defendant.


This is a motion to remand the above action to the City Court of the City of New York. The parties have stipulated that the contract of insurance upon which the plaintiff predicates his claim is a policy of maritime insurance. The action was removed from the City Court of the City of New York to this Court on the ground that the action involved a controversy based upon a policy of maritime insurance and is, therefore, an action of which the District Courts of the United States have original jurisdiction, and that the action may be removed to this Court even though the defendant is not a non-resident. Such an action on a marine insurance policy is one which can be removed by defendant to this Court without regard to the citizenship or residence of the parties. Compania Maritima Ador, S.A. v. New Hampshire Fire Ins. Co., D.C.S.D.N.Y. 1954, 120 F. Supp. 577.

The motion to remand to the City Court is denied. So ordered.


Summaries of

Noorollah Bakhshandeh v. the Continental Insurance Company

United States District Court, S.D. New York
Nov 1, 1954
129 F. Supp. 122 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)
Case details for

Noorollah Bakhshandeh v. the Continental Insurance Company

Case Details

Full title:NOOROLLAH BAKHSHANDEH, Plaintiff, v. THE CONTINENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. New York

Date published: Nov 1, 1954

Citations

129 F. Supp. 122 (S.D.N.Y. 1954)

Citing Cases

J. J. Ryan & Sons, Inc. v. Continental Insurance

And, civil actions commenced in the state court can only be removed to the federal courts if they could…