From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nolasco v. Splish Splash at Adventureland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 2010
74 A.D.3d 1303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 2009-04387.

June 29, 2010.

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kitzes, J.), dated April 1, 2009, which granted the defendants' motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Jerry C. Guarino, P.C., Bay Shore, N.Y., for appellant.

Havkins Rosenfeld Ritzert Varriale, LLP, New York, N.Y. (Carla Varriale of counsel), for respondents.

Before: Mastro, J.P., Santucci, Chambers and Roman, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The 30-year-old plaintiff was riding in a raft on the "Hollywood Stunt Rider" attraction at Splish Splash Water Park in Riverhead when he dove head first out of the raft and into a shallow pool, causing him to strike his head. The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, and the Supreme Court granted the motion. We affirm.

The defendants satisfied their prima facie burden of establishing their entitlement to judgment as a matter of law by demonstrating that the plaintiff was the sole proximate cause of his injuries ( see Howard v Poseidon Pools, 72 NY2d 972, 974). Given that the plaintiff had prior experience swimming and diving, that audio and visual warnings were given regarding the shallowness of the water and against diving, and based on "plain common sense," he should have known that if he dove into the pool, the area into which he dove contained shallow water and, thus, posed a danger of injury ( Smith v Stark, 67 NY2d 693, 694; see Grodski v Greenpoint Bank, 16 AD3d 623, 624; Sciangula v Mancuso, 204 AD2d 708, 709; Feldman v Drum, 178 AD2d 504). In opposition, the plaintiff failed to raise a triable issue of fact ( see Grodski v Greenpoint Bank, 16 AD3d at 624).

The parties' remaining contentions are either academic in light of our determination or without merit.


Summaries of

Nolasco v. Splish Splash at Adventureland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 29, 2010
74 A.D.3d 1303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Nolasco v. Splish Splash at Adventureland

Case Details

Full title:GEOVANNY NOLASCO, Appellant, v. SPLISH SPLASH AT ADVENTURELAND, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 29, 2010

Citations

74 A.D.3d 1303 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 5742
903 N.Y.S.2d 250

Citing Cases

Somma v. City of N.Y.

In each of the following cases, a plaintiff was deemed the sole proximate cause of his or her injuries:…

Sharinn v. Icon Parking Sys., LLC

See Amatulli v. Delhi Constr. Corp., 77 N.Y.2d 525, 534 (1991). See, e.g., Somma v. New York, 28 Misc.3d…