Summary
Accepting defendant's argument would incorrectly make part of constitutional language “manifestly surplusage.”
Summary of this case from Gannon v. StateOpinion
No. 06-12-00009-CV
02-02-2012
KURT NOELL, Appellant v. GLENDA SUE WRIGHT, Appellee
On Appeal from the County Court at Law No. 3
Smith County, Texas
Trial Court No. 36,330P
Before Morriss, C.J., Carter and Moseley, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Moseley
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, Kurt Noell, the sole appellant in this case, has filed a motion seeking to dismiss his appeal. Pursuant to Rule 42.1 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure, his motion is granted. TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1.
Originally appealed to the Twelfth Court of Appeals, this case was transferred to this Court by the Texas Supreme Court pursuant to its docket equalization efforts. See TEX. GOV'T CODE ANN. § 73.001 (West 2005). We are unaware of any conflict between precedent of the Twelfth Court of Appeals and that of this Court on any relevant issue. See TEX. R. APP. P. 41.3.
We dismiss the appeal.
Bailey C. Moseley
Justice