From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Supreme Court of California
Feb 13, 1975
13 Cal.3d 486 (Cal. 1975)

Opinion

Docket No. L.A. 30268.

February 13, 1975.

COUNSEL

Carlyle W. Hall, Jr., Brent N. Rushforth, A. Thomas Hunt, John R. Phillips and Fredric P. Sutherland for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Lawler, Felix Hall, Robert Henigson, William K. Dial, Hanna Morton, Harold C. Morton, Edward S. Renwick, Bela G. Lugosi, Mitchell, Silberberg Knupp and Arthur Groman for Defendants and Respondents.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


OPINION

THE COURT.

After we filed our opinion in this case plaintiffs made a motion for an award of reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with the appeal. For the reasons stated in our per curiam opinion in Bozung v. Local Agency Formation Com., ante, page 483 [ 119 Cal.Rptr. 215, 531 P.2d 783] and because it is desirable that the remittitur herein issue without further delay, we deny that motion without prejudice to its renewal before the trial court.

If plaintiffs present their motion to the trial court, accompanied by an appropriate showing of time and effort expended, the trial court is directed to determine that motion, and if it concludes that plaintiffs are entitled to a reasonable attorneys fee for services performed on appeal, to fix the amount thereof. (See American City Bank v. Zetlen (1969) 272 Cal.App.2d 65, 67 [ 76 Cal.Rptr. 898].) The clerk is directed to incorporate the foregoing orders in the remittitur to be issued in No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles (L.A. 30268) ante, page 68 [ 118 Cal.Rptr. 34, 529 P.2d 66], and to include therewith a certified copy of this opinion.

These orders are final forthwith.

Mosk, J. did not participate therein.


Summaries of

No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Supreme Court of California
Feb 13, 1975
13 Cal.3d 486 (Cal. 1975)
Case details for

No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Case Details

Full title:NO OIL, INC., et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF LOS ANGELES et…

Court:Supreme Court of California

Date published: Feb 13, 1975

Citations

13 Cal.3d 486 (Cal. 1975)
119 Cal. Rptr. 216
531 P.2d 784

Citing Cases

Wildlife Alive v. Chickering

Although the question whether attorneys' fees are recoverable in proceedings such as the present one is…

No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los Angeles

Prior to the issuance of the remittitur in No Oil I, plaintiffs made a motion before the Supreme Court for an…