Summary
concluding that the narrowing function does not occur under the FDPA until the penalty phase
Summary of this case from U.S. v. FrankOpinion
No. 97-30144.
November 14, 1997.
Appeal from the E.D.La.
Affirmed.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
NME HOSPITALS v. AMERICAN CAS
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 14, 1997
132 F.3d 1454 (5th Cir. 1997)
Summaries of
NME HOSPITALS v. AMERICAN CAS
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Nov 14, 1997
132 F.3d 1454 (5th Cir. 1997)
concluding that the narrowing function does not occur under the FDPA until the penalty phase
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Frankreversing criminal contempt conviction because written order directing the defendant, a plaintiff's attorney, "not to . . . introduce any evidence regarding the financial status of the [d]efendant," did not clearly and unambiguously specify that attorney could not introduce defendant's payroll information, as opposed to evidence regarding its net worth
Summary of this case from United States v. Hovinddismissing Title VII claim against individual employees
Summary of this case from Anaya v. Houston Indep. Sch. Dist.excluding non-statutory factors as duplicative
Summary of this case from U.S. v. Franknoting that a jury could convict a defendant of kidnapping in which death results but find, at the penalty phase, that the defendant did not cause the death of the victim during the course of the kidnapping
Summary of this case from U.S. v. FrankCase details for
NME HOSPITALS v. AMERICAN CAS
Case Details
Full title:NME Hospitals v. American Cas
Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Date published: Nov 14, 1997
Citations
132 F.3d 1454 (5th Cir. 1997)
Citing Cases
U.S. v. Frank
prosecutions under the Act. A growing body of case law, derived largely from district court opinions and a…
In re L.R.See also La. Ch.C. arts. 811.1, 893, and 909-911. In United States v. Davis, 902 F. Supp. 98 (E.D. La. 1995),…