From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.L.R.B. v. Twin Cities Electric

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 2, 1990
907 F.2d 108 (9th Cir. 1990)

Summary

holding that the exception applies to suits to enforce federal labor laws

Summary of this case from In re Thomas

Opinion

No. 89-70489.

Submitted to Motions Panel June 25, 1990.

Decided July 2, 1990.

On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.

Before CANBY, WIGGINS and TROTT, Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The court is informed that respondent Twin Cities Electric has petitioned for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code. Twin Cities Electric asserts that continuation of this enforcement action is automatically stayed as to it pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 362(a). However, the filing of a bankruptcy petition does not bar or stay an enforcement proceeding instituted by the National Labor Relations Board. See 11 U.S.C. § 362(b)(4), (5) (West 1979); NLRB v. Evans Plumbing Co., 639 F.2d 291, 293 (5th Cir. 1981). Accordingly, this appeal is ready for calendaring.


Summaries of

N.L.R.B. v. Twin Cities Electric

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Jul 2, 1990
907 F.2d 108 (9th Cir. 1990)

holding that the exception applies to suits to enforce federal labor laws

Summary of this case from In re Thomas
Case details for

N.L.R.B. v. Twin Cities Electric

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER, v. TWIN CITIES ELECTRIC; BIG G…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Jul 2, 1990

Citations

907 F.2d 108 (9th Cir. 1990)

Citing Cases

Lockyer v. Mirant Corp.

Only the bankruptcy court that issued the injunction has the authority to modify the injunction, and until…

N.L.R.B. v. P*I*E Nationwide, Inc.

We also stated in dicta that Board proceedings would not fall under the automatic stay provision under the…