From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

N.L.R.B. v. Production Plating Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 19, 1980
614 F.2d 1117 (6th Cir. 1980)

Opinion

No. 78-1041.

February 19, 1980.

Elliott Moore, William Wachter, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Jay Shanklin, Wyneva Johnson, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Emil Farkas, Director, Region 9, N.L.R.B., Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner.

Robert F. Houlihan, Lexington, Ky., Joseph A. Yocum, Evansville, Ind., for respondent.

Petition from the National Labor Relations Board.

Before EDWARDS, Chief Judge, and PHILLIPS and PECK, Senior Circuit Judges.


ORDER

The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement of its order reported at 233 NLRB No. 25. The Board's order was based upon findings that the company had violated the National Labor Relations Act by illegal surveillance and coercion designed to prevent free exercise of employee rights to engage in collective bargaining and by discharging three employees because of union activities.

After review of the briefs and record, this court concludes that the findings of the Board are based upon substantial evidence upon the whole record and that the bargaining order is appropriate under the principles enunciated in NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., Inc., 395 U.S. 575, 89 S.Ct. 1918, 23 L.Ed.2d 547 (1969). Wherefore the enforcement is granted as prayed for.


Summaries of

N.L.R.B. v. Production Plating Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Feb 19, 1980
614 F.2d 1117 (6th Cir. 1980)
Case details for

N.L.R.B. v. Production Plating Co.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, PETITIONER, v. PRODUCTION PLATING COMPANY…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Feb 19, 1980

Citations

614 F.2d 1117 (6th Cir. 1980)

Citing Cases

Harry Carian Sales v. Agricultural Labor Relations Bd.

The Gissel court itself expressly approved the Board's long standing policy of issuing bargaining orders,…