From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of Review

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 4, 1963
41 N.J. 64 (N.J. 1963)

Opinion

Argued September 24, 1963 —

Decided November 4, 1963.

On appeal from the Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Michael J. O'Neil argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Sidney Reitman argued the cause for the respondent, Esther W. Rowe ( Messrs. Kapelsohn, Lerner, Leuchter Reitman, attorneys).

Mr. Edward A. Kaplan argued the cause for the respondent, Board of Review.

Messrs. Lum, Biunno Tompkins filed a brief amicus curiae ( Mr. Vincent P. Biunno, of counsel).


The judgment is affirmed for the reasons expressed in the majority opinion of Judge Sullivan in the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice WEINTRAUB and Justices JACOBS, FRANCIS, PROCTOR, HALL, SCHETTINO and HANEMAN — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of Review

Supreme Court of New Jersey
Nov 4, 1963
41 N.J. 64 (N.J. 1963)
Case details for

New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. Board of Review

Case Details

Full title:NEW JERSEY BELL TELEPHONE COMPANY, A CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: Nov 4, 1963

Citations

41 N.J. 64 (N.J. 1963)
194 A.2d 729

Citing Cases

Iorio v. Board of Review

Therefore, a woman who was forced to quit her job because of illness due to pregnancy was not eligible for…

Electronic Associates, Inc. v. Heisinger

Compare Iorio v. Board of Review, 88 N.J. Super. 141 (App.Div. 1965), with New Jersey Bell Tel. Co. v. Board…