From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nixon v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 15, 1968
206 So. 2d 877 (Ala. 1968)

Opinion

3 Div. 270.

January 18, 1968. Rehearing Denied February 15, 1968.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Montgomery County, Eugene W. Carter, J.

Chas. S. Conley, Montgomery, for appellant.

Sankey Sankey, Montgomery, for appellee.


Appellee has moved for affirmance of the judgment appealed from on the ground that "the appellant's brief does not contain a condensed recital of the evidence in narrative form under the heading, 'Statement of the Facts,' which would enable the Court to determine whether the Court below decided the case correctly under the law and the evidence," as required by Rule 9(b) of the Revised Rules of the Supreme Court of Alabama, 279 Ala. XXIII, XXVI.

The motion is well-taken, and the judgment is due to be affirmed. See: Employers Insurance Company of Alabama, Inc. v. Watkins, 280 Ala. 681, 198 So.2d 258; Bolton v. Barnett Lumber Supply Company, 267 Ala. 74, 100 So.2d 9, and cases there cited.

Affirmed.

LAWSON, COLEMAN, and HARWOOD, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nixon v. Richardson

Supreme Court of Alabama
Feb 15, 1968
206 So. 2d 877 (Ala. 1968)
Case details for

Nixon v. Richardson

Case Details

Full title:Alfred F. NIXON v. Lena G. RICHARDSON

Court:Supreme Court of Alabama

Date published: Feb 15, 1968

Citations

206 So. 2d 877 (Ala. 1968)
206 So. 2d 877

Citing Cases

State v. Argo-Collier Truck Lines Corporation

Appellee's motion is well taken and the decree is due to be affirmed. See: Limbaugh v. Comer, 265 Ala. 202,…

Metzger Brothers, Inc. v. Friedman

"The index to the record shows that seven witnesses testified, but there is no effort by appellants to comply…