From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nix v. Nix

Supreme Court of Florida
May 31, 2007
959 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2007)

Opinion

No. SC06-1326.

May 31, 2007.

Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal — Certified Great Public Importance First District — Case No. 1D04-4766 (Escambia County).

Ross A. Keene of Beroset and Keene, Pensacola, FL, for Petitioner.

Phillip S. Howell and Ryan Pedraza of Galloway, Johnson, Tompkins, Burr and Smith, P.L.C., Gulf Breeze, FL, for Respondent.


We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the First District Court of Appeal in Nix v. Nix, 930 So.2d 711 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), in which the district court certified the following question to be of great public importance:

IS A SPOUSE WHO IS AWARDED A PORTION OF THE OTHER SPOUSE'S PENSION AT THE TIME OF DISSOLUTION ENTITLED TO SHARE IN A DROP ACCOUNT CREATED, INCLUDING INTEREST AND COLAS, SOMETIME AFTER THE DISSOLUTION HAS BECOME FINAL?

Id. at 714. However, upon further consideration, we exercise our discretion and discharge jurisdiction. The issue certified is not applicable to this case and any decision by this Court would only be advisory. See State v. Schebel, 723 So.2d 830, 830 (Fla. 1999); Interlachen Lakes Estates, Inc. v. Brooks, 341 So.2d 993, 995 (Fla. 1976). In addition, the issue involving the formula to be used to determine the retirement share of the wife was resolved by the parties in their stipulation. For these reasons, this review proceeding is hereby dismissed.

It is so ordered.

LEWIS, C.J., and WELLS, PARIENTE, QUINCE, CANTERO, and BELL, JJ., concur.

ANSTEAD, J., concurs in result only.


Summaries of

Nix v. Nix

Supreme Court of Florida
May 31, 2007
959 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2007)
Case details for

Nix v. Nix

Case Details

Full title:Richard A. NIX, Petitioner, v. Brenda W. NIX, Respondent

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: May 31, 2007

Citations

959 So. 2d 209 (Fla. 2007)

Citing Cases

Arnold v. Arnold

Subsequent to the trial court's ruling below, we decided two cases making clear that benefits giving rise to…