From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nivogor Realty Corporation v. Gifford-Wood Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1938
253 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Opinion

January 21, 1938.


Order granting motion by plaintiff to strike out the first and second defenses and the first and second partial defenses in the answer of defendant as being insufficient in law, modified by providing that the first defense shall be retained in the answer; as so modified the order is affirmed, without costs. Defendant may serve an amended answer within ten days from the entry of the order hereon. The defenses of waiver, consent, acquiescence and ratification, whether under the terms of the contract by practical interpretation of the parties or otherwise, or by subsequent conduct, may properly await the production of proof on the trial in respect to the validity thereof. The hypothetical form of pleading is not approved. Carswell, Davis and Close, JJ., concur; Hagarty and Adel, JJ., dissent as to modification and vote to affirm.


Summaries of

Nivogor Realty Corporation v. Gifford-Wood Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jan 21, 1938
253 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)
Case details for

Nivogor Realty Corporation v. Gifford-Wood Co.

Case Details

Full title:NIVOGOR REALTY CORPORATION, Respondent, v. GIFFORD-WOOD CO., Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jan 21, 1938

Citations

253 App. Div. 837 (N.Y. App. Div. 1938)

Citing Cases

Stuberfield v. Long Is. City Sav. Assn

Facts must be alleged, not conclusions ( Walrath v. Hanover Fire Ins. Co., 216 N.Y. 220, 224). The pleader's…

Lazar v. Steinberg

The hypothetical nature of the affirmative defense contained in the answer makes it defective. (3 Carmody on…