From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nitto Shosen K.K. v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 12, 1965
350 F.2d 399 (9th Cir. 1965)

Summary

predicting that our Court would not find TCA's notice requirements applicable to CEPA actions

Summary of this case from Owens v. Feigin

Opinion

No. 19633.

August 12, 1965.

Gordon K. Wright, Francis J. MacLaughlin, Lillick, Geary, McHose Roethke, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant, Nitto Shosen K.K.

Ben Margolis, Margolis McTernan, Los Angeles, Cal., George E. Shibley, Long Beach, Cal., for appellee, Wm. H. Johnson.

Robert Sikes, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant, Crescent Wharf Warehouse Co.

Before ORR, MERRILL and ELY, Circuit Judges.


We find no error in the instructions given when the charge is read as a whole. Accordingly upon both appeals judgment is affirmed.


Summaries of

Nitto Shosen K.K. v. Johnson

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Aug 12, 1965
350 F.2d 399 (9th Cir. 1965)

predicting that our Court would not find TCA's notice requirements applicable to CEPA actions

Summary of this case from Owens v. Feigin
Case details for

Nitto Shosen K.K. v. Johnson

Case Details

Full title:NITTO SHOSEN K.K., Appellant, v. William H. JOHNSON, Appellee. CRESCENT…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Aug 12, 1965

Citations

350 F.2d 399 (9th Cir. 1965)

Citing Cases

Smiddy v. Varney

We look to the entire jury charge, which in this case was quite lengthy, to determine whether the…

Owens v. Feigin

However, no statutory cause of action subject to the TCA's procedural requirements has been brought to our…