From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nichols v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Dec 11, 2006
913 A.2d 570 (Del. 2006)

Summary

holding Rule 35 motion was not appropriate vehicle for defendant arguing that sentence was illegal because underlying conviction was not supported by evidence

Summary of this case from Reed v. State

Opinion

88, 2006.

December 11, 2006.

Appeal from Superior Cr 9512007450.


Decisions without Published Opinions Affirmed.


Summaries of

Nichols v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware
Dec 11, 2006
913 A.2d 570 (Del. 2006)

holding Rule 35 motion was not appropriate vehicle for defendant arguing that sentence was illegal because underlying conviction was not supported by evidence

Summary of this case from Reed v. State
Case details for

Nichols v. State

Case Details

Full title:Nichols v. State

Court:Supreme Court of Delaware

Date published: Dec 11, 2006

Citations

913 A.2d 570 (Del. 2006)

Citing Cases

State v. Meades

Nichols v. State, 913 A.2d 570 (Del. 2006).…

State v. Cook

In essence, Defendant's motion is not one challenging an illegal sentence under Superior Court Criminal Rule…