From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nguyen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 6, 1990
566 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Summary

In Nguyen v. State, 566 So.2d 368 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), in circumstances similar to the instant case, we reversed concurrent sentences of four years incarceration followed by two years supervision for two third-degree felonies, in light of section 958.04(2)(d).

Summary of this case from McKee v. State

Opinion

No. 89-2550.

September 6, 1990.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, R. James Stroker J.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Brynn Newton, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and James N. Charles, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a sentence.

Qualified persons under age twenty-one may receive alternative sentencing treatment under Chapter 958, which sets the criteria for youthful offender treatment and limits the period of incarceration to four years maximum. In addition, the sentencing court can impose two years probation or community service to commence after release from incarceration. § 958.04(2)(c), Fla. Stat. Appellant was sentenced for two third degree felonies, each of which carries a maximum of five years imprisonment. Because he was given the youthful offender "four plus two" on each sentence, albeit to run concurrently, the sentences were technically excessive. Section 958.04(2)(d), Florida Statutes says:

The court may commit the youthful offender to the custody of the department for a period of not more than 6 years, provided that any such commitment shall not exceed the maximum sentence for the offense for which the youthful offender has been convicted. [emphasis supplied].

The sentencing court can impose virtually the same punishment by giving appellant consecutive sentences, neither of which exceeds the "four plus two" youthful offender formula. Under Allen v. State, 526 So.2d 69 (Fla. 1988), the court cannot exceed the six-year cap, no matter how many sentences are imposed at the time he is sentenced. We vacate the sentence and remand for resentencing.

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

DAUKSCH, GOSHORN and GRIFFIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Nguyen v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Sep 6, 1990
566 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

In Nguyen v. State, 566 So.2d 368 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990), in circumstances similar to the instant case, we reversed concurrent sentences of four years incarceration followed by two years supervision for two third-degree felonies, in light of section 958.04(2)(d).

Summary of this case from McKee v. State

noting that chapter 958 limits the period of incarceration in youthful-offender sentences to four years maximum

Summary of this case from Lampkins v. State

noting that chapter 958 limits the period of incarceration in youthful-offender sentences to four years maximum

Summary of this case from Lampkins v. State

sentencing court can impose any youthful offender sentence, so long as no matter how many sentences are imposed, the total does not exceed the four years incarceration followed by two years probation or community control allowed by the applicable Youthful Offender Statute

Summary of this case from Kelly v. State
Case details for

Nguyen v. State

Case Details

Full title:DUC CONG NGUYEN, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Sep 6, 1990

Citations

566 So. 2d 368 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1990)

Citing Cases

McKee v. State

In the instant case, McKee should have received no more than five years for each conviction. In Nguyen v.…

Lampkins v. State

In his rule 3.800(a) motion to correct sentence, he argues that the incarcerative portion exceeds the…