From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newton v. New York Gas Co.

U.S.
Mar 6, 1922
258 U.S. 178 (1922)

Opinion

APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF THE UNITED STATES FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK.

No. 296.

Argued January 6, 1922. Decided March 6, 1922.

Approving the conclusion of the master and the District Court that a gas rate fixed under Laws New York, 1906, c. 125, had become confiscatory. 269 F. 277, affirmed.

APPEAL from a decree enjoining enforcement of a statutory gas rate as confiscatory. See also the cases, ante, 165, and post, 180.

Mr. Wilber W. Chambers, with whom Mr. Charles D. Newton, Attorney General of the State of New York, and Mr. Clarence R. Cummings were on the brief, for Newton, Attorney General.

Mr. M. Maldwin Fertig, with whom Mr. John P. O'Brien and Mr. James A. Donnelly were on the brief, for Wallace, District Attorney.

Mr. William L. Ransom, with whom Mr. John A. Garver, Mr. Charles A. Vilas and Mr. Jacob H. Goetz were on the briefs, for appellee.


This appeal brings up for review a final decree entered November 19, 1920, which adjudged that in so far as c. 125, Laws of New York of 1906, prohibited appellee from charging and receiving more than $1.00 per thousand cubic feet for gas delivered and sold in the Third Ward, Borough of Queens, New York City, it was and had been confiscatory since January 1, 1919. 269 F. 277.

After taking a great mass of evidence the Master reported that the actual cost to appellee of manufacturing and distributing gas exceeded $1.00 per thousand cubic feet and that the challenged act was confiscatory. With this conclusion the trial court agreed and entered an appropriate decree. We find no sufficient ground for disapproving the action so taken, and it is accordingly

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Newton v. New York Gas Co.

U.S.
Mar 6, 1922
258 U.S. 178 (1922)
Case details for

Newton v. New York Gas Co.

Case Details

Full title:NEWTON, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL. v . NEW YORK…

Court:U.S.

Date published: Mar 6, 1922

Citations

258 U.S. 178 (1922)

Citing Cases

New York Queens Gas Co. v. Prendergast

should deduct from the cost new a sum which will represent the accrued depreciation on the property from the…

Brooklyn Borough Gas Co. v. Prendergast

There was tendered in this case no proof of depreciation in the plaintiff's property. The plaintiff offered…