From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newport News Sb. Dry Dock v. Schauffler

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 2, 1937
91 F.2d 730 (4th Cir. 1937)

Opinion

No. 4222.

August 2, 1937.

Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk; Luther B. Way, Judge.

Suit by the Newport News Shipbuilding Dry Dock Company, a corporation, against Bennet F. Schauffler, individually and as Regional Director for the Fifth Region, National Labor Relations Board, and as the National Labor Relations Board, and others. From the decree, the plaintiff appeals.

Affirmed.

Fred H. Skinner, of Newport News, Va., and H.H. Rumble, of Norfolk, Va. (John Marshall, of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for appellant.

Malcolm F. Halliday, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Washington, D.C., for appellees.

Before PARKER, NORTHCOTT, and SOPER, Circuit Judges.



This is an appeal from a decree denying an application for a preliminary injunction and dismissing a bill of complaint which asked that the appellees be enjoined from proceeding to hear and pass upon a complaint filed with the Board charging the Newport News Shipbuilding Dry Dock Company with violations of the National Labor Relations Act ( 29 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.). Upon motion made before this court for a restraining order pending appeal, the merits of the appeal have been fully argued and the cause submitted for final determination as to the correctness of the decree appealed from. Without expressing any opinion whatever on any aspect of the controversy pending before the Board, we are of opinion that the action of the court below was correct. Plaintiff has an adequate remedy under the statute and may not apply for relief in equity until it has exhausted the administrative remedy there provided. The matter has been so fully considered in other circuits as not to require further discussion. See particularly Pratt v. Oberman Co. (C.C.A.8th) 89 F.2d 786; Beman v. Bendix Products Corp. (C.C.A.7th) 89 F.2d 661; Clark v. Lindemann Hoverson Co. (C.C.A.7th) 88 F.2d 59; Elliott v. El Paso Electric Co. (C.C.A.5th) 88 F.2d 505; Heller Bros. Co. v. Lind, 66 App.D.C. 306, 86 F.2d 862; E.I. Dupont De Nemours Co. v. Boland (C.C.A.2d 85 F.2d 12; Precision Castings Co. v. Boland (C.C.A.2d 85 F.2d 15; Alexander Smith Sons Carpet Co. v. Herrick (C.C.A.2d 85 F.2d 16; Bradley Lumber Co. v. National Labor Relations Board (C.C.A.5th) 84 F.2d 97. Contra Myers v. Bethlehem Shipbuilding Corp. (C.C.A.1st) 88 F.2d 154, 156 .

The application for restraining order pending appeal will be denied and the decree dismissing the bill of complaint will be affirmed.

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Newport News Sb. Dry Dock v. Schauffler

Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Aug 2, 1937
91 F.2d 730 (4th Cir. 1937)
Case details for

Newport News Sb. Dry Dock v. Schauffler

Case Details

Full title:NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING DRY DOCK CO. v. SCHAUFFLER et al

Court:Circuit Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Aug 2, 1937

Citations

91 F.2d 730 (4th Cir. 1937)

Citing Cases

Newport News Co. v. Schauffler

P. 58. 5. A cause in which equitable relief was sought to prevent injury which allegedly would result from…

Union Premier Food Stores, Inc. v. Retail Food Clerks & Managers Union, Local No. 1357

I concur in the holding of the majority opinion of this Court that the District Judge did not possess the…