From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1936
249 App. Div. 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

November 16, 1936.


In an action in malpractice to recover damages against respondent, a dentist, for alleged negligence in treatment of appellant, order vacating appellant's notice of examination before trial affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The appellant, on the motion to vacate, failed to show that the testimony was either material or necessary to prove the allegations of negligence contained in the complaint, and, further, the proposed examination calls for testimony to which, in our opinion, it is questionable whether the plaintiff is entitled. Young, Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Taylor, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Newman v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 16, 1936
249 App. Div. 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Newman v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:ELEANOR NEWMAN, Appellant, v. BERCU FISCHER, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 16, 1936

Citations

249 App. Div. 637 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Citing Cases

McLaughlin v. McLaughlin

These authorities demonstrate that in an action such as this the plaintiff's separate property and resources…

McLaughlin v. McLaughlin

" Recently in Woronzoff-Daschkoff v. Woronzoff-Daschkoff (supra, p. 512) it observed: "Of course, a husband…