From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. Dore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 1937
250 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)

Opinion

February 26, 1937.

Appeal from Supreme Court, New York County.

Present — Martin, P.J., Townley, Glennon, Untermyer and Dore, JJ.; Glennon and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and direct judgment in favor of the plaintiff; dissenting opinion by Untermyer, J.


Edgar Bibas died on November 19, 1936, after appeal had been taken, and the defendant-respondent, Arthur G. Dore, continued to act and is now acting as the surviving executor and trustee.

Judgment affirmed, with costs to respondents Arthur G. Dore, as surviving trustee, etc., and Clara Dorner Straus. No opinion.


For the reasons stated and upon the authorities cited in my dissenting opinion in Bodner v. Feit ( 247 App. Div. 119), I vote to reverse the judgment and direct judgment in favor of the plaintiff. To the authorities cited in Bodner v. Feit ( supra) should be added the recent decision of this court in Matter of Glen ( 247 App. Div. 518; affd., 272 N.Y. 530). The statute (Dec. Est. Law, § 18) only entitled the wife upon the death of her husband to take an interest in his "estate." Until after death there can, of course, be no "estate." During life both parties remain the absolute owners of their separate property and may dispose of it for any purpose or from any motive.

Glennon, J., concurs.


Summaries of

Newman v. Dore

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Feb 26, 1937
250 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)
Case details for

Newman v. Dore

Case Details

Full title:EMMA STRAUS NEWMAN, Appellant, v. ARTHUR G. DORE and EDGAR BIBAS, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Feb 26, 1937

Citations

250 App. Div. 708 (N.Y. App. Div. 1937)