From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newman v. Austin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 29, 2021
320 So. 3d 1004 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)

Opinion

No. 1D20-2152

06-29-2021

Alexious G. NEWMAN, Petitioner, v. Tyler K. AUSTIN, Respondent.

Kansas R. Gooden and Geneva R. Fountain of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner. Aaron Sprague, Daniel A. Iracki, Howard C. Coker, and David C. Thompson, Coker Law, Jacksonville, for Respondent.


Kansas R. Gooden and Geneva R. Fountain of Boyd & Jenerette, P.A., Jacksonville, for Petitioner.

Aaron Sprague, Daniel A. Iracki, Howard C. Coker, and David C. Thompson, Coker Law, Jacksonville, for Respondent.

Per Curiam.

DISMISSED. See Jaye v. Royal Saxon, Inc ., 720 So. 2d 214, 215 (Fla. 1998) ("[I]t is settled law that, as a condition precedent to invoking a district court's certiorari jurisdiction, the petitioning party must establish that it has suffered an irreparable harm that cannot be remedied on direct appeal."); see also CQB 2010, LLC v. Bank of N.Y. Mellon , 177 So. 3d 644, 645 (Fla. 1st DCA 2015) (refusing to grant certiorari review of order denying discovery because petitioner failed to show that denial would eviscerate its case).

B.L. Thomas, Kelsey, and Tanenbaum, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Newman v. Austin

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.
Jun 29, 2021
320 So. 3d 1004 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)
Case details for

Newman v. Austin

Case Details

Full title:Alexious G. NEWMAN, Petitioner, v. Tyler K. AUSTIN, Respondent.

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

Date published: Jun 29, 2021

Citations

320 So. 3d 1004 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2021)