From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Newcomb v. La Roe

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1916
113 N.E. 1061 (N.Y. 1916)

Opinion

Argued May 10, 1916

Decided May 30, 1916

Nelson L. Robinson, William A. Hoy and Fred M. La Duke for appellant.

D-Cady Herrick, George Bell and Benjamin Patterson for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: WILLARD BARTLETT, Ch. J., HISCOCK, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, SEABURY and POUND, JJ.


Summaries of

Newcomb v. La Roe

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 30, 1916
113 N.E. 1061 (N.Y. 1916)
Case details for

Newcomb v. La Roe

Case Details

Full title:WARREN P. NEWCOMB, as Executor of H. VICTOR NEWCOMB, Deceased, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 30, 1916

Citations

113 N.E. 1061 (N.Y. 1916)
113 N.E. 1061

Citing Cases

Matter of Revson

As a third-party beneficiary of the guarantee, Jill became a creditor of her grandfather. A legacy from a…

Matter of Blanch

There are many exceptions to this rule of construction, some of which are mentioned in Reynolds v. Robinson (…