From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

U.S.
Apr 6, 1964
376 U.S. 967 (1964)

Opinion

Nos. 39, 40.

April 6, 1964.


Ante, p. 254. The motion of respondent for the apportionment of printing costs and fees is denied. Sam Rice Baker, M. Roland Nachman, Jr. and Calvin Whitesell on the motion. Herbert Wechsler for New York Times Co., in opposition.


Summaries of

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

U.S.
Apr 6, 1964
376 U.S. 967 (1964)
Case details for

New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK TIMES CO. v. SULLIVAN and ABERBATHY ET AL. v. SULLIVAN

Court:U.S.

Date published: Apr 6, 1964

Citations

376 U.S. 967 (1964)

Citing Cases

Texas-Capital Contractors, Inc. v. Abdnor

Although administrative agencies may be relieved from observance of strict common law rules of evidence,…

Tashof v. F.T.C

NYJC's claim is that the Commission erred in relying on expert testimony of prevailing prices, and in…