From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Telephone Company v. Speciner

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1982
434 N.E.2d 708 (N.Y. 1982)

Opinion

Decided February 23, 1982

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department, ALVIN F. KLEIN, J.

Julius L. Schapira for appellant.

Stephen L. Ratner for respondent.



On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 N.Y.CRR 500.2 [b]), order insofar as appealed from reversed, with costs, cross motion for a permanent stay denied, and motion to compel arbitration granted. A timely demand for arbitration was made by Marshall in February, 1972 well within the six-year Statute of Limitations and was judicially stayed until the condition precedent to arbitration was satisfied. The condition was met in November, 1973 after Marshall submitted its claim to the architect who failed to render a decision within 10 days. Any further questions as to undue delay or abandonment of the proceeding are for the arbitrator (see Matter of County of Rockland [ Primiano Constr. Co.], 51 N.Y.2d 1).

Concur: Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, and MEYER. Taking no part: Judges GABRIELLI and FUCHSBERG.


Summaries of

New York Telephone Company v. Speciner

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 23, 1982
434 N.E.2d 708 (N.Y. 1982)
Case details for

New York Telephone Company v. Speciner

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent, v. JULES V. SPECINER, as Trustee…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 23, 1982

Citations

434 N.E.2d 708 (N.Y. 1982)
434 N.E.2d 708
449 N.Y.S.2d 472

Citing Cases

Re v. Powell

The Supreme Court erred in determining, as a matter of law, that the appellants abandoned the demand to…

Matter of Continental Insurance Co. v. Richt

There was no reason whatsoever why the demand for arbitration could not have been made within the six-year…