From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Telephone Company v. Alvord Swift

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1975
49 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

September 25, 1975


Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered on February 26, 1975, unanimously affirmed. Cross-petitioner-respondent shall recover of appellant $40 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Special Term correctly found that cross-petitioner-respondent, Stewart M. Muller Construction Co., Inc., was not obligated to arbitrate with appellant Alvord Swift since their contract did not specifically incorporate by reference or otherwise the arbitration clause of the main contract between Muller and New York Telephone Company. Furthermore, as stated by the court, there was no mutuality of obligation as regards remedies between Muller and Alvord Swift. The record fully supports the determination appealed from and we affirm on the opinion of Mr. Justice Helman below.

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Murphy, Lupiano, Lane and Nunez, JJ.


Summaries of

New York Telephone Company v. Alvord Swift

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1975
49 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

New York Telephone Company v. Alvord Swift

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK TELEPHONE COMPANY, Respondent, v. ALVORD SWIFT, Appellant…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 25, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 726 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Citing Cases

Dolp 1133 Props. II LLC v. Amazon Corporate, LLC

Had these sophisticated parties wished to make a breach of Section 28 subject to the NDA, they would have…

CFG Merch. Sols. v. Canyon Power Sols.

The cases cited by the defendants do not hold otherwise. New York Telephone Company v. Alvord & Swift, 49…