From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Presbyterian Hosp. v. Auto One Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

2005-08573.

April 4, 2006.

In an action to recover no-fault insurance benefits under certain insurance contracts, the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Dunne, J.), dated August 18, 2005, which granted the defendant's motion to vacate a judgment entered April 1, 2005, upon its failure to appear or answer, awarding the plaintiffs the principal sum of $28,060.13, and for an extension of time to answer pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d), and granted the defendant's separate motion to quash an information subpoena.

Joseph Henig, P.C., Bellmore, N.Y., for appellants.

Jeena R. Belil, Melville, N.Y. (Tina B. Davidson of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Santucci, Mastro and Rivera, JJ., concur.


Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in granting the defendant's motion to vacate its default in answering and for an extension of time to answer pursuant to CPLR 3012 (d). The defendant demonstrated both a reasonable excuse for its brief delay in serving an answer, and potentially meritorious defenses. Furthermore, there is a strong public policy in favor of resolving cases on the merits, and the default was not willful, nor was there a showing of prejudice to the plaintiffs ( see Harcztark v. Drive Variety, Inc., 21 AD3d 876; Bunch v. Dollar Budget, Inc., 12 AD3d 391; Orwell Bldg. Corp. v. Bessaha, 5 AD3d 573; Sippin v. Gallardo, 287 AD2d 703).

The defendant's motion to quash the information subpoena was properly granted ( see CPLR 2304).


Summaries of

New York Presbyterian Hosp. v. Auto One Ins. Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 4, 2006
28 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

New York Presbyterian Hosp. v. Auto One Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:NEW YORK AND PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL et al., Appellants, v. AUTO ONE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 4, 2006

Citations

28 A.D.3d 441 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 2509
811 N.Y.S.2d 584

Citing Cases

New York University Hospital Rusk Institute v. Illinois National Insurance

ilure to timely appear and answer the complaint and potentially meritorious defenses, namely, the failure of…

New Century Fin. Servs., Inc. v. Shaheen

But if the judgment is subject to modification by the rendering court, it need not be afforded full faith and…