From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New York Land Co. v. Chapman

New York Superior Court — General Term
Oct 1, 1895
14 Misc. 187 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)

Opinion

October, 1895.

B.N. Harrison, for motion.

Parrish Pendleton, opposed.


Upon a trial of the issues had on December 10, 1891, the judge presiding directed a verdict for the defendant, on which judgment was shortly thereafter entered for $442.65, costs. The plaintiff thereupon appealed to the General Term. A case on appeal was served, to which amendments were proposed by the respondent. Notice was given that the case and amendments would be presented to the trial judge for settlement on a day named. An adjournment was had by consent of the respective attorneys until December 12, 1892.

On the day preceding the last-mentioned date the respondent's attorney died, and the appellant in consequence did not proceed with the proposed settlement; indeed, the death of the respondent's attorney suspended all further proceedings until another attorney was substituted, or until thirty days after service of notice on the client to appoint a new attorney Code, § 65. No such notice was given.

On April 9, 1895, Burton N. Harrison was, by order duly entered and served, made the attorney of record for the defendant. The plaintiff was then in a position to proceed, but nevertheless remained passive. No order has been made directing the filing of the case or declaring the case abandoned (Super. Ct. Rule 6); hence the respondent is not in a position to demand the unconditional dismissal of the appeal, but he is entitled to arouse the plaintiff to action and compel it to prosecute or abandon the appeal.

The plaintiff has not proceeded with proper diligence, and is guilty of laches in neglecting to renotice the case for settlement after the substitution of Mr. Harrison in April last. While the death of the defendant's former attorney suspended proceedings, the suspension was temporary only, and ceased on the service of the order appointing the new attorney. The duty of proceeding with the appeal according to prescribed practice was revived and the plaintiff was called upon to act.

In view of the almost inexcusable neglect to proceed, the defendant's motion to dismiss the appeal must be granted, with costs, unless within five days after service of the order to be entered herein the plaintiff causes the case and amendments to be submitted to the trial judge for settlement and pays ten dollars costs and disbursements, in which event the motion will be denied, without costs.

Present: FREEDMAN, MCADAM and GILDERSLEEVE, JJ.

Motion granted, with costs, unless plaintiff causes the case and amendments to be submitted to the trial judge within five days of the service of the order herein and pays costs of motion, in which event motion denied, without costs.


Summaries of

New York Land Co. v. Chapman

New York Superior Court — General Term
Oct 1, 1895
14 Misc. 187 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)
Case details for

New York Land Co. v. Chapman

Case Details

Full title:THE NEW YORK LAND IMPROVEMENT Co., Appellant, v . WILLIAM S. CHAPMAN…

Court:New York Superior Court — General Term

Date published: Oct 1, 1895

Citations

14 Misc. 187 (N.Y. Misc. 1895)
35 N.Y.S. 468

Citing Cases

Huzhou Chuangtai Rongyuan Inv. Mgmt. P'ship v. Hui Qin

That judgment shall calculate all amounts in U.S. dollars, converted from Renminbi as of the date of…

Commissions Import Export S.A. v. Republic of Congo

ORDER : On January 14, 2020, Petitioner filed a motion requesting that the Court: (i) amend the October 9,…