From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Tp. of Washington

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 11, 1977
73 N.J. 180 (N.J. 1977)

Opinion

Argued February 23, 1977 —

Decided May 11, 1977.

Appeal from Superior Court, Appellate Division.

Mr. Bernard M. Reilly argued the cause for appellant ( Mr. Herbert J. Olarsch, attorney).

Mr. Henry F. Satterthwaite argued the cause for respondent Township of Washington ( Messrs. Satterthwaite Satterthwaite, attorneys).

Mr. Richard T. O'Connor argued the cause for respondent Township of Manalapan ( Mr. Marvin E. Schaefer, attorney; Mr. W. Peter Ragan, on the brief).

Mr. Richard L. Rudin, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for Amicus Curiae, Mr. William F. Hyland, Attorney General of New Jersey ( Mr. Stephen Skillman, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Stephen A. Herman, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).


In this appeal, which is before us on certification to the Appellate Division, 70 N.J. 151 (1976), the judgment is affirmed for the reasons stated in Judge Kole's opinion for the Appellate Division. 137 N.J. Super. 543 (1975).

For affirmance — Chief Justice HUGHES, Justices MOUNTAIN, SULLIVAN, PASHMAN, CLIFFORD and SCHREIBER and Judge CONFORD — 7.

For reversal — None.


Summaries of

New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Tp. of Washington

Supreme Court of New Jersey
May 11, 1977
73 N.J. 180 (N.J. 1977)
Case details for

New Jersey Turnpike Authority v. Tp. of Washington

Case Details

Full title:NEW JERSEY TURNPIKE AUTHORITY, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, v. TOWNSHIP OF…

Court:Supreme Court of New Jersey

Date published: May 11, 1977

Citations

73 N.J. 180 (N.J. 1977)
373 A.2d 652

Citing Cases

So. Brunswick Tp. v. Bellemead Dev. Corp.

For purposes of farmland assessment, however, actual use, and not the circumstances of either the farmer or…

WHITE v. BERNARDSVILLE BOR

The New Jersey Constitution, Art. VIII, § 1, par. 1(b) and the implementing legislation in the act, N.J.S.A.…