From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

New Dominion, L.L.C. v. BP Oil Supply Company

United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
May 11, 2009
Case No. CIV-09-0075 JHP (E.D. Okla. May. 11, 2009)

Opinion

Case No. CIV-09-0075 JHP.

May 11, 2009


ORDER


Now before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss, Transfer or Stay Proceedings [Dkt #8] filed on March 5, 2009. The Court has carefully considered the Motion, Plaintiff's Response to the Motion [Dkt #18], and Defendant's Reply [Dkt #22]. For good cause shown, the Court finds the claims raised by Plaintiff in this action should be heard by the United States District Court for the District of Delaware (the "Delaware Bankruptcy Court"), and that to avoid duplication of effort and the risk of inconsistent rulings, the Motion should be granted, in part, and the action transferred.

Accordingly, in the interest of justice and for the convenience of the parties, this action shall be transferred, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1404 and 1412, to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court. The Clerk of this Court is hereby directed to transfer the above-captioned case to the Delaware Bankruptcy Court, to transfer all papers filed in this action to the Clerk of the Delaware Bankruptcy Court.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

New Dominion, L.L.C. v. BP Oil Supply Company

United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
May 11, 2009
Case No. CIV-09-0075 JHP (E.D. Okla. May. 11, 2009)
Case details for

New Dominion, L.L.C. v. BP Oil Supply Company

Case Details

Full title:NEW DOMINION, L.L.C., Plaintiff, v. BP OIL SUPPLY COMPANY, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Oklahoma

Date published: May 11, 2009

Citations

Case No. CIV-09-0075 JHP (E.D. Okla. May. 11, 2009)

Citing Cases

In re Semcrude, L.P.

In so ruling, those courts have cited, among other considerations, the risk of inconsistent rulings and the…

In re SemCrude, L.P.

13 In so ruling, those courts have cited, among other considerations, the risk of inconsistent rulings and…