From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neuwirth v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Greater N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 3, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 718 (N.Y. 1984)

Opinion

Argued March 23, 1984

Decided May 3, 1984

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the Second Judicial Department, Douglas F. Young, J.

John Colucci, Ellen B. Levin, John L. Shurtleff and Jerrold I. Ehrlich for appellants.

Louis S. Ederer and Marvin S. Cowan for respondent.


MEMORANDUM.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, with costs, and, on defendants' stipulation, judgment granted in favor of plaintiff.

The burden of proving that a claim falls within the exclusions of an insurance policy rests with the insurer (see International Paper Co. v Continental Cas. Co., 35 N.Y.2d 322, 327; Prashker v United States Guar. Co., 1 N.Y.2d 584, 594). Accordingly, the trial court properly ordered a new trial after it recognized that it had erroneously charged the jury that the insured's representative had the burden of proof as to the application of the exclusions.

Chief Judge COOKE and Judges JASEN, JONES, WACHTLER, MEYER, SIMONS and KAYE concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.


Summaries of

Neuwirth v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Greater N.Y

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 3, 1984
62 N.Y.2d 718 (N.Y. 1984)
Case details for

Neuwirth v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Greater N.Y

Case Details

Full title:MARVIN R. NEUWIRTH, as Executor of KITTY NEUWIRTH, Deceased, Respondent…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 3, 1984

Citations

62 N.Y.2d 718 (N.Y. 1984)
476 N.Y.S.2d 814
465 N.E.2d 353

Citing Cases

Great American Fid. Ins. Co. v. JWR Constr. Servs., Inc.

Ace Wire & Cable Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 60 N.Y.2d 390, 398 (N.Y. 1983) . "Generally, it is the…

Great Am. Fid. Ins. Co. v. JWR Constr. Servs., Inc.

“Generally, it is the insured's burden to establish coverage and the insurer's burden to prove the…