Opinion
November 19, 1985
Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Arthur Blyn, J.).
Appellant has neglected to appeal from the judgment subsequent to the order granting summary judgment. The customary rule has been that an appeal taken from an order which is followed by the entry of final judgment in the same action must fall and review may only be had upon appeal from the final judgment. Here, however, the final judgment ministerially implements the order granting summary judgment, and the appeal from the order should be deemed an appeal from the subsequent judgment in which the order was subsumed, and the appeal should be considered on the merits. (National Bank v Kory, 63 A.D.2d 579.)
Defendant partnership had operated a coffee shop in space it leased at plaintiff's hospital and then sold the business to a third party. Plaintiff's treasurer was present at the closing of the sale because, as a condition of the sale, plaintiff was to execute a new lease with the buyer.
After the closing was completed and after his attorney had departed, defendant Otto, one of the partners, wrote a check in the amount of $14,500 payable to plaintiff. On the following day Otto stopped payment on the check, and plaintiff instituted the instant action, moving pursuant to CPLR 3213 to recover on the check.
It was inappropriate to grant summary judgment on this record. Unresolved triable issues of fact and credibility are presented by the conflicting papers (including inconsistencies in plaintiff's own proofs) regarding the circumstances surrounding the delivery of the check and the reasons for its payment.
Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Ross, Fein, Milonas and Ellerin, JJ.