Nettles v. State

Full title: Coran NETTLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

Court: Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION ONE.

Date published: Sep 10, 2019

582 S.W.3d 927 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019)

Opinion

No. ED 106743

09-10-2019

Coran NETTLES, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.

FOR APPELLANT: Maleaner Harvey, Asst. Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101. FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, MO 65102.

PER CURIAM.

FOR APPELLANT: Maleaner Harvey, Asst. Public Defender, 1010 Market St., Ste. 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101.

FOR RESPONDENT: Eric S. Schmitt, Attorney General, Daniel N. McPherson, Asst. Atty. Gen., P.O. Box 899, St. Louis, MO 65102.

Before Robert M. Clayton III, P.J., Robert G. Dowd, Jr., J., and Roy L. Richter, J.

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Coran Nettles appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).