From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 22, 2009
No. C08-00019 JW (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)

Opinion

No. C08-00019 JW (HRL).

December 22, 2009


ORDER (1) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSIVE LETTER; AND (2) CLARIFYING DECEMBER 16, 2009 ORDER [Re: Docket No. 349]


This court is in receipt of defendants' December 18, 2009 and plaintiffs' responsive letter of the same date re this court's December 16, 2009 "Order Granting In Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel" (Docket No. 345). Having considered both letters, this court supplements and clarifies its December 16, 2009 order with respect to defendants' revenue spreadsheets as follows:

Plaintiffs' motion to compel the production of documents underlying defendants' revenue spreadsheets is denied. With respect to revenue allocation, it appears that underlying documents do not exist. (See, e.g., Kitchen Decl. ISO Defendants' Sur-Reply). Plaintiffs have not otherwise convincingly demonstrated that defendants failed to satisfy their reasonably construed discovery obligations.


Summaries of

Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software, Inc.

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Dec 22, 2009
No. C08-00019 JW (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)
Case details for

Netbula, LLC v. Chordiant Software, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:NETBULA, LLC and DONGXIAO YUE, Plaintiffs, v. CHORDIANT SOFTWARE, INC.…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Dec 22, 2009

Citations

No. C08-00019 JW (HRL) (N.D. Cal. Dec. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Yakubets

The Softel court refused to find vicarious liability when the only relevant evidence of a “ ‘direct’…