From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nesbitt v. U.S.

U.S.
Feb 28, 1966
383 U.S. 926 (1966)

Summary

noting that the liability of the government was bounded by the termination for convenience clause, even where the clause was not invoked by the government at the time of termination

Summary of this case from Linan-Faye Const. v. Housing Authority

Opinion

No. 904.

February 28, 1966, OCTOBER TERM, 1965.


Certiorari denied. C. D. Ellison for petitioner. Solicitor General Marshall, Assistant Attorney General Weisl, S. Billingsley Hill and Elizabeth Dudley for the United States. Reported below: 170 Ct. Cl. 666, 345 F. 2d 583.


Summaries of

Nesbitt v. U.S.

U.S.
Feb 28, 1966
383 U.S. 926 (1966)

noting that the liability of the government was bounded by the termination for convenience clause, even where the clause was not invoked by the government at the time of termination

Summary of this case from Linan-Faye Const. v. Housing Authority
Case details for

Nesbitt v. U.S.

Case Details

Full title:NESBITT v. UNITED STATES. CT. CL

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 28, 1966

Citations

383 U.S. 926 (1966)
86 S. Ct. 931

Citing Cases

Torncello v. United States

The appellant claims that the Government failed to order all of those services and that as a result the…

National Dairy Products Corp. v. F.T.C

Foremost Dairies, Inc. v. Federal Trade Commission, 348 F.2d 674, 680 (5th Cir. 1965), certiorari denied, 382…