From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Sep 11, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-762 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2012)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-762

09-11-2012

OSBORN GERARD NELSON v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID


MEMORANDUM ORDER ADOPTING THE MAGISTRATE

JUDGE'S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

Petitioner, Osborn Gerard Nelson, an inmate formerly confined at the Polunsky Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division, proceeding pro se, filed this petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254.

The Court referred this matter to the Honorable Zack Hawthorn, United States Magistrate Judge, at Beaumont, Texas, for consideration pursuant to applicable laws and orders of this Court. The Magistrate Judge recommends this petition be dismissed.

The Court has received and considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge filed pursuant to such order, along with the record, and pleadings. No objections to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge were filed by the parties.

ORDER

Accordingly, the findings of fact and conclusions of law of the Magistrate Judge are correct and the report of the Magistrate Judge is ADOPTED. A final judgment will be entered in this case in accordance with the Magistrate Judge's recommendations.

______________________

Thad Heartfield

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Nelson v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION
Sep 11, 2012
CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-762 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2012)
Case details for

Nelson v. Dir., TDCJ-CID

Case Details

Full title:OSBORN GERARD NELSON v. DIRECTOR, TDCJ-CID

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS BEAUMONT DIVISION

Date published: Sep 11, 2012

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:09-CV-762 (E.D. Tex. Sep. 11, 2012)

Citing Cases

Messing v. Judge Dolph Drug Co.

The matter was one of inference from the facts shown. Settle v. Railroad, 127 Mo. 336; Dakan v. Mercantile…

Fanning v. Hines

It is only where the facts are such that all reasonable men must draw the same conclusion that the question…