From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Darling

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Jan 29, 1930
103 Cal.App. 523 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)

Opinion

Docket No. 5874.

January 29, 1930.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court. Appeal dismissed.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

E.H. Woodward for Appellant.

H.S. Clewett for Respondents.


This cause is before us on the respondent's motion to dismiss the appeal taken from a judgment of the Superior Court affirming a judgment of the Municipal Court of the City of Los Angeles. The action was for the recovery of real estate broker's commissions, and it is evident from an inspection of the clerk's transcript that the cause of action arose within the city of Los Angeles, where the plaintiff brokers had their office and where the agreement for exchange of properties and payment of commissions was entered into.

[1] Where the cause of action in a suit commenced in the Municipal Court arises, as disclosed by the record therein, in the city in which such court is situated, an appeal lies only to the Superior Court, and the judgment of that tribunal is final. ( Johnston v. Wolf, 208 Cal. 286 [ 280 P. 980]; Nelson v. Thomas, ante, p. 108 [ 283 P. 982].)

The appeal is dismissed.

Craig, Acting P.J., and Thompson (Ira F.), J., concurred.


Summaries of

Nelson v. Darling

Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two
Jan 29, 1930
103 Cal.App. 523 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
Case details for

Nelson v. Darling

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE A. NELSON et al., Respondents, v. LUCY A. DARLING, Appellant

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District, Division Two

Date published: Jan 29, 1930

Citations

103 Cal.App. 523 (Cal. Ct. App. 1930)
284 P. 1095

Citing Cases

State of California v. Fred S. Renauld Co.

Cases tried in the Superior Courts may be reviewed by the District Courts of Appeal and by the Supreme Court.…