From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. Cooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Dec 18, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-745 (W.D. La. Dec. 18, 2017)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-745

12-18-2017

DAVID AARON NELSON v. KEITH COOLEY


MAGISTRATE JUDGE KAY

JUDGMENT

For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation [Doc. #10] of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, noting the absence of any objections, and determining that the findings are correct under applicable law,

IT IS ORDERED that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is hereby DENIED and DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

THUS DONE AND SIGNED, in Shreveport, Louisiana, this 18th day of December, 2017.

/s/_________

DONALD E. WALTER

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Nelson v. Cooley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION
Dec 18, 2017
CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-745 (W.D. La. Dec. 18, 2017)
Case details for

Nelson v. Cooley

Case Details

Full title:DAVID AARON NELSON v. KEITH COOLEY

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF LOUISIANA LAKE CHARLES DIVISION

Date published: Dec 18, 2017

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 2:16-CV-745 (W.D. La. Dec. 18, 2017)

Citing Cases

McBroom v. Scottish Investment Co.

The limitation of three years, under the statutes of New Mexico, within which the borrower may sue for double…

Lasater v. National Bank

— In an action by the debtor to recover back usury paid under a mortgage, or to recover the penalty for…