From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nelson v. B B Investment Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jan 4, 1963
264 Minn. 393 (Minn. 1963)

Opinion

No. 38,749.

January 4, 1963.

Appeal and error — nonappealable order.

An order granting motion for summary judgment is an intermediate order and is not appealable under Minn. St. 605.09.

Appeal by plaintiffs from an order of the Hennepin County District Court, Rolf Fosseen, Judge, granting defendants' motion for summary judgment. Upon motion of defendants, appeal dismissed.

James B. Lund, for appellants.

Richard Siegel, Robins, Davis Lyons, and Robert J. Tweedy, for respondents.


Plaintiffs appeal from an order of the District Court of Hennepin County granting defendants' motion for summary judgment under Rule 56, Rules of Civil Procedure. Defendants move to dismiss the appeal.

Rule 56.03 of Rules of Civil Procedure provides in part as follows:

"* * * Judgment shall be rendered forthwith if the pleadings, depositions, * * * and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that either party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law."

The appeal in the instant case was taken on April 19, 1962, from the order of March 28, 1962, granting the summary judgment.

The clerk's file in Hennepin County District Court indicates that the judgment roll was filed and judgment docketed on April 24, 1962. Service of notice of taxation of costs was admitted by plaintiffs' attorney on April 13, 1962, prior to the entry of judgment.

Where, as here, summary judgment is granted on all issues the aggrieved party may, upon entry of judgment, proceed with his appeal from the judgment.

We have held that this court's jurisdiction as to appeals is limited to those instances set forth in Minn. St. 605.09. We have also held that an order granting summary judgment is an intermediate order which requires a subsequent judgment to give it effect and is not appealable. Shema v. Thorpe Bros. 238 Minn. 470, 57 N.W.2d 157.

We have further held that on an appeal from a judgment "any intermediate order involving the merits or necessarily affecting the judgment appealed from" may be reviewed. § 605.09(1); Shema v. Thorpe Bros. supra.

No appeal having been taken from the judgment entered April 24, 1962, this court is without jurisdiction to proceed further in the matter and the motion and application for permission that the appeal be heard from the judgment entered must be denied and the appeal dismissed. See, General Elec. Co. v. Anchor Cas. Co. 251 Minn. 305, 87 N.W.2d 639, and In re Estate and Guardianships of Williams, 254 Minn. 272, 95 N.W.2d 91.

Appeal dismissed.


Summaries of

Nelson v. B B Investment Co. Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Jan 4, 1963
264 Minn. 393 (Minn. 1963)
Case details for

Nelson v. B B Investment Co. Inc.

Case Details

Full title:EARL J. NELSON AND ANOTHER v. B B INVESTMENT COMPANY, INC., AND OTHERS

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Jan 4, 1963

Citations

264 Minn. 393 (Minn. 1963)
119 N.W.2d 713

Citing Cases

State v. Mostad

We conclude the district court's summary judgment resolved both count one and count two of the state's…

LeRoy v. Figure Skating Club of Minneapolis

It is equally clear that the February 16 order is not appealable under Rule 103.03(d) providing for an appeal…