From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neikam v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 3, 1998
253 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)

Opinion

August 3, 1998

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Doyle, J.).


Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, with costs.

The Supreme Court denied the plaintiffs motion, denominated as one for renewal and reargument. Inasmuch as this motion was not based upon new evidence which was unavailable upon the original motion, the motion was actually one for reargument ( see, Lawless v. O'Brien, 222 A.D.2d 657). Thus, the appeal must be dismissed, because no appeal lies from an order denying reargument ( see, Segale v. Nu Wave Mar., 244 A.D.2d 326).

Rosenblatt, J. P., O'Brien, Altman and Friedmann, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Neikam v. County of Suffolk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 3, 1998
253 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
Case details for

Neikam v. County of Suffolk

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL NEIKAM, Appellant, v. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK et al., Respondents

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 3, 1998

Citations

253 A.D.2d 416 (N.Y. App. Div. 1998)
675 N.Y.S.2d 900

Citing Cases

Nationstar Mortg., LLC v. Saintval

In the present motion plaintiff again moves to renew/reargue summary judgment, this time in relation to the…