From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neely v. Lott Hotels Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois
Apr 12, 1948
78 N.E.2d 659 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)

Opinion

Gen. No. 44,277.

Opinion filed April 12, 1948. Released for publication April 23, 1948.

1. INNS, RESTAURANTS, AND LODGING HOUSES, § 2accommodations constituting relation of innkeeper and guest. Where plaintiff and wife lived at defendant's hotel and were assigned to suite or apartment and charged a daily rate, receiving maid service, towels and linens, relation of innkeeper and guest, not that of landlord and tenant, existed between parties as respects defendant's right to eject plaintiff upon his failure to pay daily charge.

See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.

2. INNS, RESTAURANTS, AND LODGING HOUSES, § 6.1fn_right to evict guest. Where relation between plaintiff and defendant hotel company was that of innkeeper and guest, and plaintiff failed to pay daily charge for suite or apartment, defendant had right to eject plaintiff from premises, using whatever reasonable force was necessary.

Appeal by defendant from the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. STEPHEN ADAMOWSKI, Judge, presiding. Heard in the first division of this court for the first district at the December term, 1947. Reversed. Opinion filed April 12, 1948. Released for publication April 23, 1948.

MITCHELL KILANOWSKI and EVERETT JENNINGS, both of Chicago, for appellant.

No appearance for appellee.


Defendant hotel company, owning and operating the Belden Stratford Hotel in Chicago, appeals from a judgment that the right to the possession of apartment 217-218, consisting of three rooms in the hotel, is in the plaintiff. Plaintiff has not filed a brief in this court.

The evidence shows that plaintiff and his wife had been living at the hotel since January 1945; that in March of that year they were assigned to the suite or apartment in controversy and charged a rate of $7 a day, where they received general maid service, towels, linens, etc. In March of 1947, plaintiff owed the hotel about $500, and thereupon promised to pay $100 weekly to liquidate his account. Plaintiff having failed to discharge his indebtedness, defendant took possession of the apartment on July 11, 1947, and thereafter excluded plaintiff from same. The relation of innkeeper and guest, and not that of landlord and tenant, existed between the parties. Having failed to pay the daily charge, defendant had the right to eject the plaintiff from the premises, using whatever reasonable force was necessary. 28 Am. Jur., Innkeepers, sec. 50; McBride v. Hosey (Tex.Civ.App.), 197 S.W.2d 372; Morningstar v. Lafayette Hotel Co., 211 N.Y. 465; Jacob v. Jacob, 125 Misc. 649, 212 N.Y. S. 62.

The judgment is reversed.

Reversed.

FEINBERG, J., concurs.

O'CONNOR, J., took no part.


Summaries of

Neely v. Lott Hotels Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois
Apr 12, 1948
78 N.E.2d 659 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
Case details for

Neely v. Lott Hotels Co.

Case Details

Full title:Thomas A. Neely, Appellee, v. Lott Hotels Company, Appellant

Court:Appellate Court of Illinois

Date published: Apr 12, 1948

Citations

78 N.E.2d 659 (Ill. App. Ct. 1948)
78 N.E.2d 659

Citing Cases

Poroznoff v. Alberti

See Levesque v. Columbia Hotel, 141 Me. 393, 44 A.2d 728 (Sup. Jud. Ct. 1945); Dewar v. Minneapolis Lodge No.…

Finsel v. Hartshorn

This court therefore concludes that the entry of Plaintiff's motel room was a search and, based upon Stoner,…