From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Neas v. Bohlen

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 14, 1938
199 A. 852 (Md. 1938)

Opinion

[Nos. 65, 66, April Term, 1938.]

Decided June 14th, 1938.

Negligence of Child — Instructions

In an action for injuries to a child, the jury having been correctly instructed that the measure of care required of a child was such care and prudence as under all the circumstances ought to have been expected from one of his age and experience, it was proper to refuse an additional instruction that a child of tender years is required to use only that degree of care which children of that age and intelligence "are accustomed to use under the circumstances."

Where the jury have, by prayers granted, been correctly instructed on a certain subject, the refusal of an additional instruction on the same subject is not error.

The reasoning of courts in opinions is not addressed to juries, and is not always adapted to use in instructions to them.

Decided June 14th, 1938.

Appeals from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County (GRASON, J.).

Actions by Arville Neas, and by Paul Neas, an infant, by Paul Neas, his father and next friend, respectively, against John E. Bohlen. From judgments for defendant, plaintiffs appeal. Affirmed.

The causes were argued before BOND, C.J., URNER, OFFUTT, PARKE, SLOAN, MITCHELL, SHEHAN, and JOHNSON, JJ.

John Grason Turnbull, with whom were Paul Berman, Frank F.J. Daily, Anthony Purcell, and Theodore B. Berman, on the brief, for the appellants.

Benjamin C. Howard, with whom were George M. Berry and Miles O'Brien on the brief, for the appellee.


Unreported cases.


Summaries of

Neas v. Bohlen

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 14, 1938
199 A. 852 (Md. 1938)
Case details for

Neas v. Bohlen

Case Details

Full title:ARVILLE NEAS v . JOHN E. BOHLEN PAUL NEAS v . JOHN E. BOHLEN

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jun 14, 1938

Citations

199 A. 852 (Md. 1938)
199 A. 852

Citing Cases

State v. Grady

Again we suggest that it is not always appropriate to quote from appellate decisions in jury instructions…

Maryland Hosp. Laundry v. Marshall

"[I]t is not always appropriate to quote from appellate decisions in jury instructions since the language…