From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Navolio v. Lawrence County

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 9, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-1286 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 08-1286.

February 9, 2010


Doc. No. 28 and 32 MEMORANDUM ORDER


Plaintiff's complaint was received by the Clerk of Court on September 15, 2008 and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

The Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 51), filed on January 5, 2010, recommended that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Primecare Medical, Inc. (Doc. No. 28) be granted, and that the Motion for Summary Judgment filed by Lawrence County (Doc. No. 32) be granted. Service was made on all counsel of record. The parties were informed that in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C), and Rule 72.1.4(B) of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges, that they had fourteen (14) days to file any objections. Objections were filed by Plaintiff on January 22, 2010. No response has been filed. The Court finds Plaintiff's objections to be without merit.

After review of the pleadings, briefs, and other documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation and the Objections filed by Plaintiff, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 9th day of February, 2010

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motions for Summary Judgment (Doc. Nos. 28 and 32) are GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over Plaintiff's state law claims.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 51) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan, dated January 5, 2010, is adopted as the opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall mark this case as closed.


Summaries of

Navolio v. Lawrence County

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Feb 9, 2010
Civil Action No. 08-1286 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2010)
Case details for

Navolio v. Lawrence County

Case Details

Full title:BRENDA S. NAVOLIO Individually and as the Administratrix of the Estate of…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Feb 9, 2010

Citations

Civil Action No. 08-1286 (W.D. Pa. Feb. 9, 2010)

Citing Cases

Laurensau v. Pluck

Under Betts, these Fourteenth Amendment claims are foreclosed under the "more-specific-provision rule" and,…

Climo v. Rustin

Moreover, the practical effect of analyzing her Fourteenth Amendment claims under the Eighth Amendment…