From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nat'l Petro. Refiners v. F.T.C.

U.S.
Feb 25, 1974
415 U.S. 951 (1974)

Summary

upholding FTC authority to promulgate substantive rules under § 6(g) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 46(g)

Summary of this case from Katharine Gibbs School (Inc.) v. Federal Trade Commission

Opinion

No. 73-806.

February 25, 1974.


ORDERS

C.A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied. MR. JUSTICE STEWART would grant certiorari. MR. JUSTICE POWELL took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition. Reported below: 157 U. S. App. D. C. 83, 482 F. 2d 672.


Summaries of

Nat'l Petro. Refiners v. F.T.C.

U.S.
Feb 25, 1974
415 U.S. 951 (1974)

upholding FTC authority to promulgate substantive rules under § 6(g) of the Federal Trade Commission Act, 15 U.S.C. § 46(g)

Summary of this case from Katharine Gibbs School (Inc.) v. Federal Trade Commission

stating that the maxim of statutory construction that the expression of one thing is the exclusion of another is increasingly considered unreliable "for it stands on the faulty premise that all possible alternative or supplemental provisions were necessarily considered and rejected by the legislative draftsmen"

Summary of this case from Coronado-Durazo v. I.N.S.
Case details for

Nat'l Petro. Refiners v. F.T.C.

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL PETROLEUM REFINERS ASSN. et al. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION et al

Court:U.S.

Date published: Feb 25, 1974

Citations

415 U.S. 951 (1974)

Citing Cases

National Nutritional Foods Ass'n v. Weinberger

On the contrary, over the last decade rule-making has been increasingly substituted for adjudication as a…

Matter of Chicago, M., St. P. Pac. R. Co.

Marshall v. Western Union Telegraph Co., 621 F.2d 1246, 1251 (3d Cir. 1980). For cases rejecting the maxim…