From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Nationscredit v. Turcios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 2007
41 A.D.3d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)

Opinion

No. 2006-09131.

June 26, 2007.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendants Luis A. Turcios and Aurora Velasquez appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Tanenbaum, J.), dated August 10, 2006, as granted the plaintiff's motion to disqualify Steven A. Sternlicht from representing them.

Steven A. Sternlicht, East Islip, N.Y. and Jeffrey M. Novick, Woodbury, N.Y., for appellants (one brief filed).

Alan Weinreb, PLLC, Farmingville, N.Y. (Stim Warmuth, P.C. [Paula J. Warmuth] of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Florio, J.P., Fisher, Carni and McCarthy, JJ.


Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The disqualification of an attorney is a matter which rests within the sound discretion of the trial court ( see Boyd v Trent, 287 AD2d 475). Disqualification is warranted if the attorney's testimony is necessary ( see S S Hotel Ventures Ltd. Partnership v 777 S. H. Corp., 69 NY2d 437, 445-446). The burden of demonstrating necessity falls upon the challenging party ( id. at 445). Under the circumstances presented, the plaintiff established that attorney Steven A. Sternlicht is an essential witness who ought to be called to testify at trial. Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiff's motion to disqualify him from representing the appellants ( see Fernandes v Jamron, 9 AD3d 379 [2004]; Chadrjian v Purcell, 293 AD2d 699; Korfmann v Kemper Natl. Ins. Co., 258 AD2d 508).


Summaries of

Nationscredit v. Turcios

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 26, 2007
41 A.D.3d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
Case details for

Nationscredit v. Turcios

Case Details

Full title:NATIONSCREDIT FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP., Respondent, v. LUIS A. TURCIOS et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 26, 2007

Citations

41 A.D.3d 802 (N.Y. App. Div. 2007)
2007 N.Y. Slip Op. 5705
839 N.Y.S.2d 523

Citing Cases

Trimarco v. Data Treasury Corp.

ORDERED that the order is reversed, on the law and in the exercise of discretion, with costs, and that branch…

Luciano v. Kennedy

Discussion The disqualification of an attorney is a matter that rests within the sound discretion of the…