From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 16, 1989
876 F.2d 376 (5th Cir. 1989)

Opinion

No. 86-3833.

June 16, 1989.

Robert V. Zener, Leonard Schaitman, Dept. of Justice, Appellate Staff, Civil Div., Washington, D.C., Joyce A. Foreman, Sparks, Nev., for defendant-appellant.

Nelson G. Dony, Terrence M. Kelly, Palo Alto, Cal., amicus curiae, for PharmChem Laboratories, Inc.

Elaine D. Kaplan, Nat. Treasury Employees Union, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs-appellees.

William P. Quigley, ACLU, David C. Whitmore, New Orleans, La., amicus curiae, for ACLU.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Robert F. Collins, Judge.

ON REMAND FROM THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT

Before KING, JOLLY and DUHE, Circuit Judges.


IT IS ORDERED that the joint motion of the parties to remand this case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana for the purpose of answering the questions set forth in Part II.C. of the United States Supreme Court's opinion in National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab, ___ U.S. ___, 109 S.Ct. 1384, 1396-97, 103 L.Ed.2d 685 (1989), is granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the joint motion of the parties to stay further briefing in this cause until action is taken on this motion is denied as moot.


Summaries of

National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Jun 16, 1989
876 F.2d 376 (5th Cir. 1989)
Case details for

National Treasury Employees Union v. Von Raab

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES UNION AND ARGENT ACOSTA, PRESIDENT, CHAPTER…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Jun 16, 1989

Citations

876 F.2d 376 (5th Cir. 1989)

Citing Cases

Natl. Treasury Employees Union v. Hallett

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge. This matter came before the Court on remand from the United States…

Luck v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.

These courts have not yet determined whether categories of persons who handle classified material may be…