From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

National Labor Rel. Board v. Mooney Aircraft

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 7, 1964
328 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1964)

Opinion

No. 20445.

February 7, 1964.

Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Robert B. Schwartz, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.

Hal Rachal, Midland, Tex., for respondent.

Before BROWN, WISDOM, and BELL, Circuit Judges.


The sole question on appeal is whether substantial evidence in the record, taken as a whole, supports the finding of the National Labor Relations Board that the respondent discharged a certain employee for union activity in violation of Section 8(a) (3) and (1) of the Act. After a careful study of the record and the briefs filed in this case, we agree that there is substantial evidence to support the Board's finding. It is therefore ordered that the Board's order be enforced.


Summaries of

National Labor Rel. Board v. Mooney Aircraft

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit
Feb 7, 1964
328 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1964)
Case details for

National Labor Rel. Board v. Mooney Aircraft

Case Details

Full title:NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. MOONEY AIRCRAFT, INC.…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit

Date published: Feb 7, 1964

Citations

328 F.2d 426 (5th Cir. 1964)

Citing Cases

N.L.R.B. v. Mooney Aircraft, Inc.

As in prior cases, we find the evidence sufficient. Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 138 NLRB 1331, enforced, N.L.R.B.…

National Labor Rel. Board v. Mooney Aircraft

Mooney Aircraft is no stranger to such litigation. See Mooney Aircraft, Inc., 138 NLRB 1331, enforced, NLRB…